Journalist Klodiana Lala was invited to the show "Kjo Javë" where she revealed details from the investigation into Deputy Prime Minister Belinda Balluku.
Lala said that due to the Constitutional Court's decision to reinstate him, SPAK has determined that Balluku is a potential risk of destroying evidence and intimidating witnesses, and this has happened to one of them.
"According to them, there is evidence that Balluku attempted to interfere and obstruct the investigation by intimidating witnesses.
"There is a serving official who has claimed and is accused of being intimidated into not confessing against her and officials and former officials of the Ministry of Energy," said Lala.
Klodiana Lala: public plenary session at the Constitutional Court that essentially had the Prime Minister's request to declare the GJKKO decision to suspend Deputy Prime Minister Belinda Balluku from office unconstitutional.
It was a session that was followed with great interest, for the way what was happening inside and outside the court. The investigation into Balluk was conducted by Dritan Prenç, but before the Mandates Council, an investigative team was formed with 3 prosecutors, Dorina Bejko and Klodian Braho, but on Thursday only Dritan Prenç and Dorina Bejko arrived.
In 36 years, we have for the first time a decision by the GJKKO to suspend a senior official.
The GJKKO notified the Constitutional Court through a letter, writing that it had issued its verdict despite the Constitutional Court having reinstated it.
The GJKKO writes that there were other courts that judged this decision whether or not it was in accordance with the law and the intervention of the Prime Minister or whether the GJK saw it as interference in the work of the judiciary, so in a way the GJKKO rejected the Constitutional Court.
The issue needs to be discussed and since her absence from the government cabinet is not a problem, she could resign. The Prime Minister's claim that suspending Balluk could create problems in the functioning of the work is unfounded.
SPAK prosecutors said that the fact that the Constitutional Court made an interim decision reinstating him has seriously undermined the investigation. According to them, there is evidence that Balluku attempted to interfere and obstruct the investigation by intimidating witnesses.
