The Constitutional Court today announced its decision regarding two requests for the establishment of parliamentary investigative committees, rejecting one and accepting the other.

According to the Constitutional Court's decision, the request to establish a parliamentary investigative commission on the McGonigal case was rejected, while the investigation into the May 11 elections was accepted.

Following this decision of the Court of Justice, the head of the DP parliamentary group, Gazment Bardhi, reacted. The latter stated that this decision is blatant evidence of political pressure on the Court.

"1 yes, 1 no, it's politics, not constitutional justice! Today's decision of the Constitutional Court to accept the request to establish the Parliamentary Investigative Committee for the parliamentary elections of May 11, 2025, while rejecting the request to establish the Parliamentary Investigative Committee for the McGonigal corruption affair, is blatant evidence of political pressure on this Court," Bardhi said.

White's reaction

1 yes, 1 no, it's politics, not constitutional justice!

Today's decision of the Constitutional Court accepting the request to establish a Parliamentary Investigative Committee for the parliamentary elections of May 11, 2025, while rejecting the request to establish a Parliamentary Investigative Committee for the McGonigal corruption affair, is blatant evidence of political pressure on this Court.

How can it be said that the request lacked the evidence to consider it a separate case, while it is based on 7 official documents of American justice, international arbitration and Albanian justice, only a court under political pressure can say. Especially since this is decided 4 to 4, and for this reason it is dismissed without a decision, just like Edi Rama's other personal affair regarding the "Becchetti" case.

But despite this, I "understand" the Constitutional Court regarding today's decision. After all, the "McGonigal" affair is the political funeral of Edi Rama and our Constitutional Court could never have the professional courage to organize it, just like their colleagues in the Special Prosecutor's Office against Corruption and Organized Crime who have been shelved criminal proceedings no. 22, of 2023, for 3.5 years.