Former prosecutor Besnik Muçi, asked on Log by moderator Endri Xhafo about today's decision by the GJKKO which suspended Deputy Prime Minister Belinda Balluku from public functions, stated that this decision-making has legal and factual logic.

According to Muçi, security measures should have been taken against Balluk earlier since, by taking her into custody, it is presumed that there is sufficient evidence that she committed a criminal offense.

"We were in the conditions of the security measure after two other criteria were met, holding public office, which means continuation of the criminal offense, and damaging evidence, very evident damaging evidence," said Muçi.

Besnik Muci: In a general analysis, there is a legal and factual logic. The indictment of a person is presumed to be based on sufficient evidence that he or she has committed a criminal offense.

I have been asked if SPAK can take a security measure. GJKKO can take a security measure against any elected official except for 3 categories such as deputies, mayors of local units and members of councils and municipalities that are elected. Against all Albanian citizens. In the specific case, why was no measure taken, we were in the conditions of the security measure, and two other criteria, the damage to evidence, the security measure should have been taken for 2 essential reasons because the position of the public function would lead to the continuation of the criminal offense and secondly that the damage to evidence is very evident. The prosecution should have taken it earlier.