The plenary session in the Assembly has begun. DP MP Jorida Tabaku has stated that the changes to the regulations that led to the Constitutional position are a flagrant case of how the rules in the Assembly have been violated.

According to her, the regulation should have condensed changes, while she added that for the opposition, unilateral changes that take up the opposition's space, and especially since they have not gone through a consultation process, violate the principles of coexistence in the Assembly.

"At the Conference of Speakers, we did not agree on the calendar because the majority proposed to present the changes to the regulation after the Constitutional Court's decision is clarified. The majority informed us that it expects the decision of the Constitutional Court to be clarified. We do not know what information the majority has that we do not have. I would like to announce that the changes to the regulation that the DP took to the Constitutional Court with a decision of the Constitutional Court that gave the opposition the right to violate, are the most flagrant case that the rules in this parliament have been violated with both feet. The new changes proposed by the SP violate rights, and create a Commission as if one is dividing the vilayets of the mother, the other the stepmother. If the Constitutional Court does not clarify the decision, we will continue normally. But I would like to announce that this discussion at the Conference is necessary to clarify that for us, the unilateral changes to the regulation are in violation of all the principles of coexistence in parliament. But with the changes to the regulation, and the new ones that the majority has proposed, the space that the Commissions have "The opposition-led parliament will be narrowed. The DP has also proposed a motion with debate regarding the US State Department report and we have not yet completed the discussion on the first report," she said.